Quantitative Performance Controls Yield Insignificant Direct Effects on E-Commerce Firm Business Success
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Contemporary management literature harbors a critical blind spot, falsely assuming rigid quantitative performance metrics automatically optimize e-commerce operations despite severe algorithmic volatility. This study investigated the empirical disconnect between outcome-based governance and multidimensional firm success by surveying exactly one hundred one organizational professionals utilizing a robust cross-sectional econometric design. The regression analysis unequivocally rejects classical control orthodoxies, demonstrating that isolated results controls yield statistically insignificant direct effects on overall business performance. Because opaque platform algorithms systematically violate the controllability principle, enforcing static numerical targets forces massive psychological friction. Consequently, instead of fostering strategic agility, this toxic metric-fixation inherently drives severe goal displacement, directly compelling marketers to artificially game short-term indicators while rapidly cannibalizing long-term brand equity. Cultivating sustainable corporate survival globally necessitates permanently dismantling isolated measurement dashboards. E-commerce enterprises must urgently integrate robust cultural control mechanisms to effectively navigate highly stochastic digital market environments and ensure long-term strategic value creation.
Downloads
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Anthony, Robert N., and Vijay Govindarajan. Management Control Systems. 13th ed. New York: McGraw Hill Education, 2017.
Barros, Rúben Silva, and Ana Maria Dias Simões da Costa Ferreira. “Management Control Systems and Innovation: A Case Study Grounded in Institutional Theory.” Journal of Management Control 34, no. 1 (March 18, 2023): 109–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00187-023-00351-4.
Einhorn, Stefanie, Bernhard Fietz, Thomas W. Guenther, and Edeltraud Guenther. “The Relationship of Organizational Culture with Management Control Systems and Environmental Management Control Systems.” Review of Managerial Science 18, no. 8 (August 5, 2024): 2321–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-023-00687-0.
Englund, Hans, and Jonas Gerdin. “Results Control and Introjected Motivation: The Case of Academia.” Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, March 20, 2026, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRAM-10-2024-0225.
Ferreira, Aldónio, and David Otley. “The Design and Use of Performance Management Systems: An Extended Framework for Analysis.” Management Accounting Research 20, no. 4 (December 2009): 263–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2009.07.003.
Gong, Taeshik. “Algorithmic Management and Gig Workers: Engagement, Exhaustion and Citizenship Behavior.” Management Decision, September 5, 2025, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-01-2025-0111.
Hair, J. F., W. C. Black, B. J. Babin, and R. E. Anderson. Multivariate Data Analysis. 8th ed. Cengage Learning, 2019.
Hanspach, Philip, Geza Sapi, and Marcel Wieting. “Algorithms in the Marketplace: An Empirical Analysis of Automated Pricing in e-Commerce.” Information Economics and Policy 69 (December 2024): 101111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2024.101111.
Jensen, Michael C., and William H. Meckling. “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure.” Journal of Financial Economics 3, no. 4 (October 1976): 305–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X.
Kaplan, Robert S., and David P. Norton. The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy Into Action. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1996.
Kellogg, Katherine C., Melissa A. Valentine, and Angéle Christin. “Algorithms at Work: The New Contested Terrain of Control.” Academy of Management Annals 14, no. 1 (January 2020): 366–410. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2018.0174.
Liu, Xueyu, Jie Lin, Xiaoyan Jiang, Tingzhen Chang, and Haowen Lin. “EWOM Information Richness and Online User Review Behavior: Evidence from TripAdvisor.” Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research 19, no. 2 (April 18, 2024): 880–98. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer19020046.
Merchant, Kenneth A., and Wim A. Van der Stede. Management Control Systems: Performance Measurement, Evaluation And Incentives. 4th ed. Harlow: Pearson Education, 2017.
Parent-Rocheleau, Xavier, and Sharon K. Parker. “Algorithms as Work Designers: How Algorithmic Management Influences the Design of Jobs.” Human Resource Management Review 32, no. 3 (September 2022): 100838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2021.100838.
Richard, Pierre J., Timothy M. Devinney, George S. Yip, and Gerry Johnson. “Measuring Organizational Performance: Towards Methodological Best Practice.” Journal of Management 35, no. 3 (June 6, 2009): 718–804. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308330560.
Ried, Leopold, Stephanie Eckerd, and Lutz Kaufmann. “Social Desirability Bias in PSM Surveys and Behavioral Experiments: Considerations for Design Development and Data Collection.” Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management 28, no. 1 (January 2022): 100743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2021.100743.
Rodríguez-Espíndola, Oscar, Richard Oloruntoba, and Chrisovalantis Malesios. “Agility and Dynamic Capabilities in Managing Supply Chain Disruptions.” Continuity & Resilience Review 8, no. 2 (2026): 211–25. https://doi.org/10.1108/CRR-09-2025-0037.
Thongkhum, Kanokporn, Narisara Peungposop, and Nanchatsan Sakunpong. “A Mixed-Methods Study to Develop a Resilience Scale for Thai Elderly with Chronic Diseases and Depression.” Edited by Marcin Rzeszutek. Depression Research and Treatment 2022 (January 15, 2022): 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3256981.
Tosi, Henry L., Edwin A. Locke, and Gary P. Latham. “A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance.” The Academy of Management Review 16, no. 2 (April 1991): 480. https://doi.org/10.2307/258875.
Vesterinen, Mikko, Joel Mero, and Mika Skippari. “Big Data Analytics Capability, Marketing Agility, and Firm Performance: A Conceptual Framework.” Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 33, no. 2 (April 3, 2025): 310–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/10696679.2024.2322600.
Wang, Xingqi, and Yanjie Ren. “The Spillover Effects of E-Commerce Platform Algorithmic Governance: A Focus on Ride-Hailing Drivers’ High-Calorie Food Consumption.” Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research 21, no. 2 (February 15, 2026): 66. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer21020066.