PSA Stabilization Clauses Limiting State Ius Imperium: An International Investment Law Perspective

Main Article Content

Rizky Akbar

Abstract

International investment agreements utilizing stabilization clauses consistently paralyze sovereign regulatory authority, creating a systemic regulatory chill that fatally obstructs the prosecution of transnational corporate crimes and massive ecological damages. This doctrinal legal research evaluated the constitutional boundaries of state police powers against the contractual immunity inherently provided by modern extractive contracts. The detailed analysis demonstrated that rigid freezing mechanisms illegitimately transform commercial risk mitigation into an absolute sovereign shield, effectively neutralizing contemporary penal jurisdiction over multinational corporations. The central thesis firmly maintains that commercial expectations can never legally justify ecological impunity or systemic corruption. To completely dismantle this structural deadlock, host states must fundamentally redesign production sharing agreements by systematically integrating an explicit penal-environmental carve-out provision. This original conceptualization establishes a progressive normative boundary that rigorously insulates domestic penal enforcement from international arbitration interference, prescriptively empowering global legal systems to secure profound ecological justice without violating any legitimate foreign investments.

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Akbar, Rizky. “PSA Stabilization Clauses Limiting State Ius Imperium: An International Investment Law Perspective”. Smart: Journal of Criminal Law Review and Analysis, vol. 1, no. 3, Aug. 2026, pp. 33-52, https://doi.org/10.65101/scrim.v1i3.55.

References

Apriyanti, Elisya Karina. “Pergeseran Paradigma Hukum Investasi Internasional: Menyeimbangkan Perlindungan Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) Dengan Kedaulatan Regulasi Negara Dalam Konteks Reformasi Perjanjian Indonesia Pasca-BIT.” Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) 3, no. 4 (2025): 217–24. https://ojs.daarulhuda.or.id/index.php/MHI/article/view/2455.

Arcuri, Alessandra. “On How the ECT Fuels the Fossil Fuel Economy: Rockhopper v Italy as a Case Study.” Europe and the World: A Law Review 7, no. 1 (2023). https://doi.org/10.14324/111.444.ewlj.2023.03. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14324/111.444.ewlj.2023.03

Arcuri, Alessandra, Kyla Tienhaara, and Lorenzo Pellegrini. “Investment Law v. Supply-Side Climate Policies: Insights from Rockhopper v. Italy and Lone Pine v. Canada.” International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 24, no. 1 (March 2024): 193–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-023-09622-w. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-023-09622-w

Beysulen Angin, Berfu. “The Right to Regulate vs Investment Protection: Unveiling the Causes of Imbalance and the Limits of Current Reform Efforts in International Investment Law.” ICSID Review - Foreign Investment Law Journal 40, no. 1 (July 25, 2025): 11–41. https://doi.org/10.1093/icsidreview/siaf007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icsidreview/siaf007

Boklan, Daria, and Chamundeeswari Kuppuswamy. “Defending Permanent Sovereignty over Natural Resources against the Obligation to Freely Trade: The International Legal Dimension.” Mineral Economics 39, no. 1 (March 17, 2026): 25–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13563-024-00473-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13563-024-00473-8

Cometti, Zoe. “Possibilities of Limiting the Protection of Large-Scale Investments in Farmland.” German Law Journal 21, no. 6 (September 10, 2020): 1198–1227. https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2020.68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2020.68

Eden, Lorraine, Stefanie Lenway, and Douglas A. Schuler. “From the Obsolescing Bargain to the Political Bargaining Model.” In International Business and Government Relations in the 21 St Century, edited by Robert Grosse, 251–72. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511488597.011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511488597.011

Fan, Lujing, and Shixi Huang. “Addressing the Challenge of Stabilization Clauses in Resolving International Energy Investment Disputes under Climate Change.” Climate Policy, July 9, 2025, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2025.2525464. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2025.2525464

Hámor, Tamás, Katalin Bódis, and Mária Hámor-Vidó. “The Legal Governance of Oil and Gas in Europe: An Indicator Analysis of the Implementation of the Hydrocarbons Directive.” Energies 14, no. 19 (October 7, 2021): 6411. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14196411. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en14196411

Hendalianpour, Ayad, Peide Liu, Sirous Amirghodsi, and Mohammad Hamzehlou. “Designing a System Dynamics Model to Simulate Criteria Affecting Oil and Gas Development Contracts.” Resources Policy 78 (September 2022): 102822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102822. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102822

Hutchinson, Terry. “Doctrinal Research.” In Research Methods in Law, 8–38. London: Routledge, 2025. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781032710372-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781032710372-2

Indonesia. “Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 13 Tahun 2016 Tentang Tata Cara Penanganan Perkara Tindak Pidana Oleh Korporasi,” 2016.

———. “Putusan Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Pada Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat Nomor 62/Pid.Sus-TPK/2022/PN.Jkt.Pst Jo. Putusan Kasasi Mahkamah Agung Nomor 4950 K/Pid.Sus/2023.” 2022, 2023.

———. “Putusan Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Pada Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat Nomor 81/Pid.Sus-TPK/2018/PN.Jkt.Pst,” 2018.

———. “Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 2009 Tentang Pertambangan Mineral Dan Batubara (UU Minerba),” 2009.

Kholiza, Ummu Fifa, Baiq Alya Shafira Mulyandhani, and Milla Achmada Arifah Mustafa. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Investor Dalam Investasi Langsung: Tinjauan Mengenai Regulasi Dan Praktik Terkini Di Indonesia.” UNES Law Review 6, no. 4 (2024): 11875–85. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2198.

Komalasari Dewi, Yetty. “Global Pandemics and Moratorium of Investment Claims: A Perspective from Indonesia.” Cogent Business & Management 10, no. 1 (December 31, 2023). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2156703. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2156703

Lindsay, R., R. McCorquodale, L. Blecher, J. Bonnitcha, A. Crockett, and A. Sheppard. “Human Rights Responsibilities in the Oil and Gas Sector: Applying the UN Guiding Principles.” The Journal of World Energy Law & Business 6, no. 1 (March 1, 2013): 2–66. https://doi.org/10.1093/jwelb/jws033. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jwelb/jws033

Nugroho, Wahyu and Muhammad Umar bin Abdul Razak. “Ecocracy and Rights of Nature: Constitutional Reconstruction of Indonesian Energy Transition Mining.” Siyasah Dusturiyah: State Law Review 1, no. 6 (May 11, 2026): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.65101/f28b8q02. DOI: https://doi.org/10.65101/f28b8q02

Paine, Joshua, and Elizabeth Sheargold. “A Climate Change Carve-Out for Investment Treaties.” Journal of International Economic Law 26, no. 2 (May 11, 2023): 285–304. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgad011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgad011

Praja, Anggit Wasesa, Gatot Hadi Purwanto, Ahlan Ramadana, Yurika Fauzia Wardhani, and Mawardi Mawardi. “Legal Certainty in Gross Split Contracts for Upstream Oil and Gas Investment.” Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Bonum Commune 9, no. 1 (February 11, 2026): 170–92. https://doi.org/10.30996/jhbbc.v9i1.133004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30996/jhbbc.v9i1.133004

UNCTAD. “Nusa Tenggara Partnership B.V. and PT Newmont Nusa Tenggara v. Republic of Indonesia (ICSID Case No. ARB/14/15),” 2014. https://investmentpolicy.unctad.org/investment-dispute-settlement/cases/584/nusa-tenggara-v-indonesia.

Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 (Amandemen Ketiga) (2001).

Walyuddin, Walyuddin. “Mitigating Regulatory Chill: Proportionality and Joint Interpretative Declarations in Energy Transition Arbitrations.” Journal of State Public Policy 1, no. 3 (May 31, 2026): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.65101/jspp.v1i3.394. DOI: https://doi.org/10.65101/jspp.v1i3.394

Yu, Chen. “Disentangling Legal Stability from Legitimate Expectations: Towards Greater Deference to Regulatory Changes in Renewable Energy Transition Policies in Investment Arbitration.” World Trade Review 24, no. 1 (February 13, 2025): 101–19. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474745624000442. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474745624000442

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.